Nepal’s major parties say dissolved parliament must be reinstated
Nepal’s major political parties, including the Nepali Congress, the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre), and the governing Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist), have come together to demand the reinstatement of the dissolved parliament. The move comes after President Bidya Devi Bhandari, at the recommendation of Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli, dissolved the parliament in May and announced early elections in November.
The parties argue that the dissolution of parliament was unconstitutional and a threat to Nepal’s democratic system. They have called for the reinstatement of the House of Representatives, emphasizing the need to uphold the principles of democracy and the rule of law. The parties have also expressed concerns about the political instability and uncertainty created by the dissolution of the parliament.
On the other hand, Prime Minister Oli defends his decision to dissolve the parliament, citing internal conflicts within the ruling party and his administration’s struggles to govern effectively. Oli has accused his opponents of trying to create obstacles in the path of development and progress for their own political gains.
As the political situation in Nepal remains fragile, with protests and demonstrations becoming more frequent, the demand for the reinstatement of the dissolved parliament has intensified. The coming days are crucial for the country as it navigates through this political crisis and seeks a way forward that ensures stability and respect for democratic values.
Sources Analysis:
Major political parties in Nepal – These parties have their own biases and interests in the political landscape of Nepal. Their goal is to regain power and influence in the government, which is a key factor in their demand for the parliament’s reinstatement.
Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli – As a directly involved party, Oli has a vested interest in defending his decision to dissolve the parliament. His goal is to consolidate power and ensure the continuity of his administration without facing internal opposition.
Fact Check:
The dissolution of the parliament in Nepal – Verified facts. This event has been widely reported and confirmed by multiple sources.
The demand for the reinstatement of the parliament – Verified facts. This information has been put forth by the major political parties involved in the issue.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Nepal’s major parties say dissolved parliament must be reinstated”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.