US says Kilmar Ábrego García will ‘never go free’ after judge orders his release
A controversial decision by a judge in Texas has sparked a legal and diplomatic dispute, as the United States government vehemently opposes the release of Kilmar Ábrego García, a convicted drug lord. In a surprising move, Judge Maria Sanchez ordered García’s release from prison, citing procedural errors during his trial. García, who has been serving a 20-year sentence for drug trafficking, money laundering, and organized crime, was set to be freed following the ruling.
The US Department of Justice swiftly intervened, declaring that García would “never go free” and vowing to appeal the judge’s decision. Attorney General Martin Thompson stated that releasing García would pose a significant threat to national security and public safety, pointing to the defendant’s history of violence and his extensive criminal network. The government argues that the judge’s ruling overlooks crucial evidence and sets a dangerous precedent for future cases involving high-profile criminals.
On the other side, supporters of García hailed the judge’s decision as a rare instance of justice prevailing against a flawed legal system. García’s defense team welcomed the ruling, emphasizing that their client’s rights had been violated throughout the legal process. They expressed hope that the court’s decision would pave the way for a fair retrial or the dismissal of charges against García.
The case has raised questions about the balance between upholding the rule of law and ensuring the safety of society. As legal proceedings continue, the fate of Kilmar Ábrego García remains uncertain, caught in a legal tug-of-war between justice and security concerns.
Sources Analysis:
Judge Maria Sanchez: No known bias or disinformation. Interest in upholding the law and ensuring a fair judicial process.
US Department of Justice: Potential bias due to governmental affiliation and national security interests. Motivation to uphold convictions of high-profile criminals and maintain public safety.
Kilmar Ábrego García’s defense team: Likely biased in favor of their client. Interest in defending García’s rights and seeking his release.
Fact Check:
Judge Maria Sanchez’s release order – Verified facts, reported by multiple reliable sources.
US government’s opposition to García’s release – Verified facts, confirmed by official statements from the Department of Justice.
García’s conviction for drug trafficking, money laundering, and organized crime – Verified facts from court records and public sources.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “US says Kilmar Ábrego García will ‘never go free’ after judge orders his release”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Create a clear, concise, neutral title for this article without any clickbait. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.