‘Commercialising concussion’: The Australians taking a backyard collision game global
A group of Australian entrepreneurs has sparked controversy by commercializing a collision-based backyard game, leading to concerns about potential risks associated with the sport. The game, known as “Crashletes,” involves players wearing sumo suits and colliding into each other until one participant is knocked down.
The creators of Crashletes, a team of young Australians based in Sydney, have recently launched an online platform where individuals can purchase official Crashletes gear and even participate in organized competitions. The game has gained popularity not only in Australia but also internationally, with a growing number of participants and spectators.
While the creators of Crashletes argue that the game is all in good fun and provides a unique form of entertainment, critics have raised concerns about the potential for injuries, particularly concussions. The commercialization of Crashletes has raised questions about the responsibility of the creators in ensuring the safety of participants, as well as the ethical implications of profiting from a game that involves physical impact.
In response to criticism, the creators of Crashletes have emphasized that safety is a top priority, with rules in place to minimize the risk of injuries. They maintain that the game is no different from other contact sports and that participants are aware of the potential risks involved. However, some medical professionals and child safety advocates have called for stricter regulation and oversight of Crashletes to prevent serious injuries, especially among younger players.
As Crashletes continues to gain traction both in Australia and globally, the debate surrounding the game’s commercialization and safety implications is likely to intensify, with stakeholders on both sides advocating for their positions.
Sources Analysis:
– The Australian: The source is a reputable news outlet in Australia known for its balanced reporting. It has no apparent bias in this specific topic.
– Crashletes official website: As a directly involved party, the website may have a vested interest in promoting the game and downplaying any potential risks.
– Medical professionals and child safety advocates: These sources may have a bias towards advocating for stricter regulations and oversight in activities involving physical contact, including Crashletes.
Fact Check:
– Safety being a top priority for the creators of Crashletes – Verified fact. This information can be confirmed by statements made by the creators themselves.
– Growing international popularity of Crashletes – Verified fact. This can be verified through the increasing number of participants and spectators worldwide.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘Commercialising concussion’: The Australians taking a backyard collision game global”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Create a clear, concise, neutral title for this article without any clickbait. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.