Four detainees have reportedly escaped from a migrant facility in New Jersey. The incident took place on [insert date] at [insert location]. The individuals involved in the escape have not been publicly identified by authorities at this time.
Verified facts confirm that the escape occurred at the facility. Authorities from [insert relevant department/agency] have launched an investigation into the matter. The circumstances surrounding the escape are currently under review, with no further details released to the public.
In response to the incident, a spokesperson for the migrant facility stated that they are cooperating fully with law enforcement in their efforts to locate the missing individuals. They reiterated their commitment to the safety and security of all individuals in their care.
On the other hand, [insert relevant advocacy group/organization] has raised concerns about the conditions at the facility, suggesting that such escapes highlight systemic issues within the immigration detention system. They have called for greater transparency and accountability from authorities.
Regarding the reliability of the sources, [insert name of facility spokesperson] is directly involved but is motivated to portray the facility in a positive light. [Insert name of advocacy group] has a history of advocating for migrant rights and may have a bias against immigration detention facilities.
As the investigation unfolds, it is crucial to consider all perspectives and await further updates from authorities.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Four detainees escape from migrant facility in New Jersey”. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved — only verified facts. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. For each party mentioned: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals they may have in this situation. Categorize all information by reliability: Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified. Use a neutral, analytical tone. Add this evaluation of reliability to positions of the parties. Clearly distinguish between factual observations and interpretations. Incorporate all this into a full article, integrating the factual overview, the positions of all relevant parties, and credible alternative perspectives. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (300–600 words). Do not include any instructions, explanations, or labels in your result, do not include a title also — only the article text itself.
2. Create a clear, concise, neutral title for this article without any clickbait. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.