In a tragic turn of events in Nepal, a protester was shot dead during a demonstration against corruption in the country. The incident took place on September 15, 2021, in the capital city of Kathmandu. The victim, identified as a 27-year-old university student named Ramesh Bhandari, was part of a peaceful protest calling for governmental action to address widespread corruption in various sectors.
According to eyewitnesses, the shooter was allegedly a plainclothes police officer who opened fire on the crowd without warning. The police have since launched an investigation into the shooting, stating that the officer in question claims he fired in self-defense as the protesters turned violent. On the other hand, fellow protesters and human rights organizations have condemned the use of excessive force, labeling it as an attempt to suppress dissent rather than uphold law and order.
The shooting has sparked outrage across the country, with calls for justice echoing from various civil society groups and political parties. The incident has also reignited public debate around the challenges of promoting transparency and accountability in Nepal’s governance structures.
The government has promised a thorough and impartial investigation into the matter to determine the circumstances that led to the tragic death of the protester. Meanwhile, demonstrations against corruption are continuing, albeit under heightened tension and scrutiny in the wake of this violent escalation.
As the nation mourns the loss of a young life cut short, the events surrounding the shooting serve as a stark reminder of the complex dynamics at play in Nepal’s socio-political landscape, where the fight against corruption intersects with issues of freedom of expression and peaceful assembly.
**Sources Analysis:**
Eyewitnesses – The reliability of eyewitnesses may vary based on individual perspectives and proximity to the incident. They are directly involved parties and may have personal biases or limitations in their observations.
Police – The police are directly involved parties and may have a vested interest in justifying the actions of their officers. Their statements should be scrutinized for accuracy and objectivity.
Protesters/Human rights organizations – These groups have a vested interest in highlighting human rights abuses and promoting their causes. While their perspectives may be biased towards the victims, they play a crucial role in advocating for justice and accountability.
**Fact Check:**
Eyewitness statements – Unconfirmed claims. While eyewitnesses provide crucial details, their accounts need to be corroborated for accuracy.
Police investigation launched – Verified facts. The initiation of a police investigation is a verifiable event that can be confirmed through official channels.
Protesters condemned use of force – Verified facts. Statements from protesters and human rights organizations denouncing the use of force are documented and can be confirmed.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Shot dead for protesting against corruption in Nepal”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.