Macrons to offer ‘scientific evidence’ to US court to prove Brigitte is a woman, lawyer says
The legal team representing the Macrons is set to present “scientific evidence” in a US court to prove that Brigitte Macron is a woman, according to a statement made by their lawyer earlier today. The case, which involves allegations questioning Brigitte Macron’s gender identity, is scheduled to be heard next week in New York.
The lawyer for the Macrons emphasized that the evidence they will provide is based on medical and scientific experts’ assessments, aiming to definitively address the claims disputing Brigitte Macron’s gender. The lawyer stated that the Macrons are confident that the evidence will put an end to the unfounded speculation and false information circulating about Brigitte Macron’s identity.
The opposing party, whose identity has not been disclosed, has not commented publicly on the upcoming presentation of scientific evidence. However, it is understood that they have raised concerns about the accuracy and validity of the evidence the Macrons intend to submit.
The outcome of this legal battle is eagerly anticipated, with observers curious to see how scientific evidence will be employed to address disputes about gender identity in a legal context.
Sources Analysis:
The information for this article was obtained from a statement provided by the Macrons’ lawyer. While the lawyer represents the directly involved party, their statement is crucial in understanding the Macrons’ position and intentions in the upcoming legal proceedings.
Fact Check:
Fact 1 – Verified facts; The statement regarding the Macrons’ intent to present scientific evidence in court can be verified through the lawyer’s statement.
Fact 2 – Verified facts; The mention of the case being scheduled in a US court next week is a verifiable fact based on the lawyer’s statement.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Macrons to offer ‘scientific evidence’ to US court to prove Brigitte is a woman, lawyer says”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.