A rare natural phenomenon known as a “firenado” ripped through a sugarcane field in Brazil earlier this week, causing extensive damage to the crops. The incident took place on Tuesday afternoon in the town of Cordeiropolis in the state of Sao Paulo. Local authorities have reported that the firenado, a whirlwind of flames and strong winds, quickly spread across the field, covering a significant area before eventually burning out.
The sugarcane field belonged to a local farming cooperative, which expressed deep concern over the impact of the firenado on their harvest. In a statement to the press, the cooperative highlighted the challenges that they now face in recovering from the damage and ensuring the supply of sugarcane products to their customers. The authorities in Cordeiropolis have begun an investigation into the incident to determine the cause of the firenado and assess any potential safety risks to the surrounding area.
Firefighters who responded to the scene worked tirelessly to contain the blaze and prevent it from spreading to neighboring properties. Fortunately, there have been no reports of injuries or fatalities resulting from the firenado. The swift action of the emergency services helped to minimize the destruction caused by the unusual event.
The phenomenon of a firenado occurs when a fire’s intense heat creates strong vertical air currents that start to rotate, forming a whirlwind that sucks in burning debris and flames. While rare, firenados can pose a significant threat to both property and lives due to their unpredictable nature and ability to spread rapidly.
The community in Cordeiropolis is now focusing on recovery efforts and supporting the affected farmers as they assess the full extent of the damage caused by the firenado. Local authorities have urged residents to remain vigilant and report any suspicious activity that could potentially lead to similar incidents in the future.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘Firenado’ tears through Brazil sugarcane field”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.