Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy has been convicted of corruption and influence-peddling, a ruling that has divided public opinion in France. The judgment, handed down on Monday by the Paris Criminal Court, found Sarkozy guilty of attempting to bribe a magistrate back in 2014 in exchange for information about a separate legal case he was involved in.
The court sentenced Sarkozy to three years in prison, with two of those years suspended. This makes him the second French president in recent years to be convicted of corruption, following Jacques Chirac in 2011. Sarkozy’s legal team has announced they will appeal the decision, denouncing it as politically motivated.
The prosecution argued that Sarkozy had offered to secure a prestigious position in Monaco for the judge in return for confidential information on an inquiry into alleged illegal campaign financing. While Sarkozy has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and claims he is the victim of a witch hunt, the court found the evidence against him to be compelling.
The verdict has sparked mixed reactions across France. Supporters of Sarkozy believe he is being unfairly targeted by the justice system, while many others see the conviction as a clear sign that no one, not even a former president, is above the law. The case has fueled ongoing debates about political corruption and accountability in the country.
Sarkozy, who served as president from 2007 to 2012, now faces the prospect of becoming the first French president in modern history to serve time in prison. The outcome of his appeal will be closely watched in France as it navigates the delicate balance between holding its leaders accountable and respecting the rule of law.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “From former president to future prisoner: Sarkozy’s conviction divides France”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.