Dozens of people walked out of the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu began his speech, in a display of protest against his government’s policies. The incident took place in New York City on September 21st, 2021.
The walkout was led by the Palestinian delegation, with representatives from countries like Iran, Syria, and Lebanon joining in solidarity. They accused Netanyahu of spreading lies and propaganda in his speech, particularly regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The delegations labeled his remarks as a distortion of reality and an attempt to whitewash Israel’s actions in the region.
In response, Netanyahu reiterated Israel’s stance on self-defense and the need to protect its citizens from terrorism. He criticized the international community for what he described as a biased approach towards Israel and a blind eye to Palestinian attacks.
The walkout reflects the ongoing tensions and deep-rooted divisions surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with both sides presenting starkly contrasting narratives on the issue.
The UN General Assembly serves as a platform for world leaders to address global challenges and promote international cooperation. However, it also highlights the longstanding conflicts and divergent viewpoints that persist within the international community.
The walkout during Netanyahu’s speech underscores the polarizing nature of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the challenges faced in seeking a peaceful resolution amidst entrenched differences.
Sources Analysis:
Palestinian Delegation – The Palestinian delegation has a history of bias against Israel and is directly involved in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Their goal is to present their narrative and garner support for their cause.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – Netanyahu has been accused of pursuing policies that are controversial in the international community, especially regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. His goal is to defend Israel’s actions and promote its perspective.
Fact Check:
The walkout during Netanyahu’s speech – Verified fact. This information is based on eyewitness accounts and has been widely reported by various news outlets.
Accusations of propaganda by the Palestinian delegation – Unconfirmed claims. While the accusations were made, determining the veracity of the propaganda allegations is subjective and based on individual perspectives.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘Order in the hall’: Dozens walk out as Netanyahu begins speech at UN”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.