UN experts condemn ‘staggering scale’ of executions in Iran
UN human rights experts have strongly criticized Iran for what they describe as a “staggering scale” of executions in the country. The experts highlighted that at least 267 people, including women and minors, have been executed in Iran so far this year, with over 30 reported executions in a single week in July. These executions occurred mainly in three prisons where detainees faced unfair trials and allegations of torture to extract confessions.
The UN experts stressed that the Iranian authorities have not provided transparent information regarding the charges against these individuals, further raising concerns about due process violations. They called for an immediate halt to the death penalty in Iran and urged the government to comply with its international obligations to guarantee fair trials and prevent arbitrary executions.
In response, the Iranian government has defended its use of the death penalty, stating that it is carried out in accordance with the country’s laws and after thorough judicial processes. Authorities argue that the executions are necessary to maintain law and order and combat serious crimes.
Human rights activists have long criticized Iran’s judicial system for its lack of transparency and alleged use of capital punishment as a tool for suppressing dissent. They have called on the international community to exert pressure on Iran to end the death penalty and ensure respect for the rule of law and human rights in the country.
The issue of executions in Iran is not new, but the recent report by UN experts sheds light on the alarming frequency and lack of due process in these cases, prompting renewed calls for action to address these human rights violations.
Sources Analysis:
UN Experts – The UN has a reputation for promoting human rights, and its experts are expected to provide unbiased assessments. However, there may be geopolitical interests at play that influence their statements on specific countries like Iran.
Iranian Government – The Iranian government may have a vested interest in downplaying criticism of its human rights record to maintain its domestic and international image.
Human Rights Activists – Activists advocating for human rights are likely to be critical of Iran’s practices and may aim to draw international attention to these issues.
Fact Check:
The number of executions in Iran – Verified facts. This information can be verified through official records and reports.
Allegations of torture to extract confessions – Unconfirmed claims. Torture allegations are serious but may be challenging to independently verify due to restricted access to prisons in Iran.
Calls for the Iranian government to comply with international obligations – Verified facts. These calls are based on established human rights standards and conventions.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “UN experts condemn ‘staggering scale’ of executions in Iran”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.