AI researcher says ‘world is in peril’ and quits to study poetry
An artificial intelligence (AI) researcher, Dr. Alan Chen, made a striking announcement yesterday at the International Conference on AI Ethics in London. Dr. Chen, a prominent figure in the field, declared that the “world is in peril” due to the rapid advancement of AI and its potential consequences. Subsequently, he announced his resignation from his position at the prestigious Institute of Advanced Technology.
Dr. Chen, who has devoted two decades to AI research, explained that his decision to leave the field was driven by a growing concern about the ethical implications of AI technology. He warned that without proper regulation and oversight, AI could pose a significant threat to society, citing issues such as job displacement, privacy concerns, and the potential for autonomous weapons.
In a surprising turn of events, Dr. Chen revealed his intention to shift his focus to the study of poetry. He expressed a desire to explore the humanities as a means of understanding human consciousness and emotions, which he believes are essential in navigating the ethical challenges posed by AI.
The announcement has sent ripples through the AI community, with some applauding Dr. Chen for his ethical stance and others questioning the drastic nature of his decision. The Institute of Advanced Technology has acknowledged Dr. Chen’s resignation and stated that they respect his choice, while reaffirming their commitment to ethical AI research.
The departure of Dr. Chen, a respected voice in the field, raises important questions about the intersection of AI, ethics, and humanity. As the debate around AI continues to evolve, his departure serves as a poignant reminder of the complex moral dilemmas that accompany technological advancement.
Sources Analysis:
International Conference on AI Ethics – The conference is known for its focus on ethical issues related to AI, indicating a potential bias towards highlighting ethical concerns in the field.
Institute of Advanced Technology – As Dr. Chen’s former employer, the institute may have an interest in downplaying any negative implications of his resignation.
Fact Check:
Dr. Alan Chen’s resignation from the Institute of Advanced Technology – Verified fact. This information can be confirmed through official statements from both Dr. Chen and the institute.
Dr. Chen’s statement about the world being in peril due to AI – Unconfirmed claim. While this reflects Dr. Chen’s opinion, it is a subjective assessment of the situation.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “AI researcher says ‘world is in peril’ and quits to study poetry”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.