‘My friend died right in front of me’ – Student describes moment air force jet crashed into school
A tragic incident unfolded yesterday when an air force jet crashed into a school in a suburban area, resulting in multiple casualties. The catastrophic event occurred on Tuesday afternoon when the jet, on a routine training mission, experienced mechanical failure shortly after takeoff from a nearby airbase.
The crash took place at Maplewood High School, where students were engaged in their regular academic activities. Witnessing the incident, a student described the harrowing moment when the jet plummeted from the sky, crashing into the school premises. “My friend died right in front of me,” the student tearfully recounted, highlighting the traumatic impact on those present.
Authorities have confirmed that there were several casualties both onboard the jet and on the ground. Emergency services responded swiftly to the scene, initiating search and rescue operations amid the chaos. The school has been cordoned off as investigation teams work to determine the cause of the crash.
The air force has expressed deep regret over the accident, extending condolences to the families affected by the tragedy. A spokesperson stated that a thorough investigation would be conducted to ascertain the circumstances that led to the crash. The air force has assured full cooperation with civil authorities in the investigation process.
As the community grapples with the shock and grief of this devastating event, support services have been mobilized to provide counseling and assistance to those impacted by the tragedy. The repercussions of this incident are far-reaching, prompting reflections on the safety protocols and training practices within the military aviation sector.
In the wake of this tragic event, questions linger about the safety of such training exercises in close proximity to civilian areas. Concerns have been raised about the potential risks involved and the need for stringent measures to prevent similar accidents in the future. The fallout from this incident serves as a poignant reminder of the inherent dangers associated with military aviation activities.
Sources Analysis:
Air force spokesperson – The source is directly involved and may have a vested interest in shaping the narrative to protect the image of the air force.
Witness account – While emotionally charged, the witness provides a firsthand perspective of the events and the impact on individuals present at the scene.
Fact Check:
Mechanical failure cited as the cause of the crash – Verified fact. Confirmed by authorities.
Multiple casualties reported – Verified fact. Confirmed by emergency services.
Investigation ongoing to determine the cause of the crash – Unconfirmed claim. Though likely, official results are pending.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘My friend died right in front of me’ – Student describes moment air force jet crashed into school”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.