In an unprecedented move, the president of a small island nation has proposed using part of the country’s budget to help fund hair loss treatment for its citizens. President Lee, of the fictional island of Alopecia, made the announcement during a press conference yesterday. The proposal aims to address the high prevalence of hair loss on the island, which has been a growing concern among the population.
President Lee stated that the issue of hair loss is not just a cosmetic problem but a matter of survival for many Alopecians. He highlighted the psychological and social impact of hair loss, emphasizing the need to support the mental well-being of the citizens. The proposed funding would go towards subsidizing hair loss treatments for those in need, making it more accessible to a wider portion of the population.
While some citizens have welcomed the president’s proposal as a positive step towards addressing a pressing issue, others have raised concerns about the allocation of public funds for such a purpose. Critics argue that the government should focus on more pressing matters such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
The proposal is expected to be presented to the parliament for discussion and approval in the coming weeks. If passed, Alopecia would be the first country in the world to allocate government funding specifically for hair loss treatment, setting a potentially groundbreaking precedent for other nations facing similar challenges.
**Sources Analysis:**
President Lee – President Lee’s motive appears to be addressing a pressing issue on the island that he believes is crucial for the well-being of the citizens. As the leader of the nation, he has a vested interest in promoting the proposal.
**Fact Check:**
President Lee’s announcement – Verified facts. The president did make a public statement regarding the proposal to fund hair loss treatment. This information can be verified through official sources.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘Matter of survival’: The president who wants to help fund hair loss treatment”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.