Amazon apologises after showing 15-rated film to child who rented PG movie
Amazon has issued an apology after a 12-year-old girl in the UK was shown a 15-rated horror film instead of the PG movie she had rented on the streaming platform. The incident took place on Friday evening when the girl, along with her family, rented the 2016 animated film “Trolls” on Amazon Prime to watch at their home in Plymouth.
However, when they started the movie, instead of the colorful and friendly characters of “Trolls,” they were confronted with the violent and gruesome scenes of the horror movie “The Autopsy of Jane Doe.” The 15-rated film includes graphic imagery and is deemed unsuitable for children under the age of 15 due to its frightening content.
The family immediately turned off the movie, but the young girl was reportedly left scared and upset by the brief exposure to the inappropriate content. Amazon has since apologized for the error, acknowledging that there was a technical issue that resulted in the wrong movie being played and expressing regret for any distress caused to the child and her family.
In response to the incident, a spokesperson for Amazon stated, “We are very sorry for the distress this has caused and have reached out to the family to apologize.” The company has also confirmed that they are investigating the matter to ensure such mistakes do not occur in the future.
The family involved has expressed their shock and concern over the incident, emphasizing the need for better safeguards to prevent children from being exposed to unsuitable content. They have called for greater accountability on the part of streaming platforms like Amazon to avoid similar mishaps in the future.
Overall, the incident highlights the potential risks associated with digital content platforms and the importance of ensuring appropriate parental controls are in place to protect young viewers from accessing unsuitable material.
Sources Analysis:
The sources used for this article include statements from Amazon and the family involved. Amazon, as a global technology company, has a vested interest in maintaining a positive reputation and customer trust. The family, as the affected party, may have a bias towards emphasizing the negative impact of the incident to push for stricter regulations on content platforms. Both sources are directly involved in the situation and could have their motives influenced by their interests.
Fact Check:
The fact that the family rented the movie “Trolls” on Amazon Prime and was shown the 15-rated film “The Autopsy of Jane Doe” is a verified fact based on their statements. The distress caused to the child and the family is also a verified fact, as reported by various sources.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Amazon apologises after showing 15-rated film to child who rented PG movie”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.