An advertisement for an AI editing app claiming to be able to “remove anything” has been banned by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) in the UK. The ad, which was seen on social media, featured a picture of a woman with various imperfections on her face and body. The text alongside the image stated, “See a blemish, just remove it. Anything you don’t want, gone in an instant.”
The ASA received multiple complaints about the ad, arguing that it promoted unrealistic and harmful beauty standards. Critics also raised concerns about the potential impact on users’ mental health and self-esteem.
In response to the ban, the company behind the app defended its product, stating that the ad was meant to showcase the app’s advanced editing capabilities rather than to promote unrealistic beauty standards. They emphasized that the app could be used for various editing purposes beyond altering one’s appearance.
The ASA, however, concluded that the ad was irresponsible and could negatively impact vulnerable individuals. They ruled that the ad must not appear again in its current form and advised the company to ensure their future marketing communications were socially responsible.
The ban highlights growing concerns about the influence of digital editing tools on perceptions of beauty and the pressure to attain unrealistic standards in today’s society.
Sources Analysis:
– ASA: The ASA is a regulatory body known for upholding advertising standards and guidelines. It aims to protect consumers and ensure ads are responsible and truthful in the UK.
– Company behind the app: The company has a vested interest in promoting its product and may downplay any negative implications associated with it.
Fact Check:
– The ad claimed the AI editing app could “remove anything” – Unconfirmed claims. This is a claim made in the ad and cannot be definitively proven without further evidence or testing.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Ad for AI editing app which said it could ‘remove anything’ banned”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.