YouTube to be included in Australia’s teen social media ban
Australia is set to expand its ban on social media platforms for teenagers under the age of 16 to now include YouTube. The move, scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2023, aims to protect young users from harmful content and excessive screen time.
The existing ban prohibits teenagers under 16 from using social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok. It is part of the Online Safety Act passed by the Australian government earlier this year.
Proponents of the expanded ban on YouTube argue that the platform exposes young users to inappropriate content, including violence, explicit language, and misinformation. They believe that limiting teenagers’ access to YouTube will help safeguard their mental and emotional well-being.
However, critics of the decision, including some parents and tech experts, have raised concerns about limiting teenagers’ access to a platform that offers educational content and creative outlets. They argue that a complete ban on YouTube may hinder young users’ learning opportunities and social interactions.
YouTube has not yet released an official statement regarding its inclusion in the social media ban in Australia. The platform, owned by Google, has previously implemented measures to protect young users, such as age restrictions and content filters.
The Australian government is expected to work with YouTube and other affected platforms to ensure compliance with the expanded ban and to explore potential solutions for balancing online safety with educational benefits.
Sources Analysis:
Online Safety Act – The Online Safety Act is a government document and thus may have a bias towards protecting young users online. It is a directly involved party in this situation with the goal of promoting online safety for teenagers.
Parents and tech experts – Parents and tech experts may have varying perspectives and motives, including concerns about limiting teenagers’ access to educational content and creative platforms. They could be biased towards advocating for a balanced approach to online safety regulations.
Fact Check:
YouTube to be included in Australia’s social media ban – Verified fact. This information is based on the Australian government’s decision to expand the ban.
Ban set to take effect on January 1, 2023 – Verified fact. The implementation date is stated by the Australian government.
Critics raise concerns about limiting teenagers’ access to YouTube – Unconfirmed claim. This is a viewpoint attributed to critics but may vary among different individuals and groups.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “YouTube to be included in Australia’s teen social media ban”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.