In a remarkable twist of fate, two Austrian women who were switched at birth met each other 35 years later. The mix-up occurred in 1986 at the Mauer hospital in the city of Linz, involving two baby girls who were mistakenly swapped in the maternity ward. The error went unnoticed for decades until one of the women, now adults, decided to take a DNA test out of curiosity.
The two women, identified in local reports as Sophie and Anneliese, discovered the shocking truth after the DNA test confirmed they were not biologically related to the parents who had raised them. Following further investigation, it was revealed that the hospital had mistakenly placed the babies in the wrong cribs, leading to the decades-long mix-up.
Sophie and Anneliese have since expressed a mix of emotions, including shock, disbelief, and a desire to learn more about their biological families. The hospital has issued a public apology for the grave mistake, citing outdated manual record-keeping systems as a contributing factor to the error.
As the two women come to terms with this life-changing revelation, authorities have launched an investigation into the incident to prevent similar mistakes from occurring in the future. The families involved have requested privacy during this sensitive time as they navigate the complex emotions and implications of this extraordinary event.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Two Austrian women switched at birth meet 35 years later”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.