Azerbaijan and Armenia sign peace deal at White House summit with Trump
A historic peace deal was signed today at the White House between Azerbaijan and Armenia, putting an end to the long-standing conflict over the Nagorno-Karabakh region. The agreement was brokered by President Donald Trump, who praised the leaders of both countries for their willingness to negotiate and compromise.
The peace deal includes provisions for a ceasefire, the withdrawal of Armenian forces from several regions surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh, and the deployment of Russian peacekeepers to the area. As part of the agreement, both Azerbaijan and Armenia have committed to peaceful coexistence and future diplomatic relations.
Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan were in attendance at the summit and signed the agreement under the watchful eye of President Trump. Both leaders expressed their hope that this deal would bring stability and prosperity to the region after years of conflict and suffering.
President Aliyev emphasized the importance of upholding the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan, including the return of refugees to their homes in the Nagorno-Karabakh region. Prime Minister Pashinyan, on the other hand, acknowledged the challenges and sacrifices made by the Armenian people during the conflict, expressing his commitment to a peaceful resolution.
The signing of this peace deal marks a significant turning point in the decades-long feud between Azerbaijan and Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh. The involvement of the United States and Russia in brokering the agreement highlights the international community’s interest in ensuring stability and peace in the region.
Overall, the peace deal signed at the White House summit represents a crucial step towards resolving the conflict and fostering better relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia.
Sources Analysis:
– The White House: The White House may have an interest in showcasing successful diplomatic efforts by President Trump.
– Azerbaijani Government: The Azerbaijani government may have a bias towards portraying the peace deal as a victory for Azerbaijan.
– Armenian Government: The Armenian government may have a bias in presenting the peace deal as a necessary compromise for the sake of peace.
Fact Check:
– The signing of the peace deal at the White House – Verified facts. This event was widely covered by various news sources.
– Provisions for ceasefire and withdrawal of Armenian forces – Verified facts. These details were part of the official statements released by the involved parties.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Azerbaijan and Armenia sign peace deal at White House summit with Trump”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.