Azerbaijan and Armenia sign peace deal at White House summit with Trump
Azerbaijan and Armenia have signed a historic peace deal at a summit held at the White House, mediated by President Donald Trump. The agreement, aimed at ending the long-standing conflict over the Nagorno-Karabakh region, was signed by Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.
The conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia over the Nagorno-Karabakh region dates back to the late 1980s when the region, predominantly inhabited by ethnic Armenians, sought independence from Azerbaijan. The dispute escalated into a full-scale war in the early 1990s, resulting in thousands of casualties and displacements. Despite several ceasefire agreements over the years, the conflict remained unresolved until now.
As part of the peace deal, Armenia has agreed to withdraw its forces from the Nagorno-Karabakh region, which will now be monitored by Russian peacekeepers. In return, Azerbaijan has promised to halt its military operations in the area. The agreement also includes provisions for the exchange of prisoners of war and the return of displaced civilians.
Both President Aliyev and Prime Minister Pashinyan have expressed hope that the peace deal will bring stability to the region and pave the way for lasting peace between Azerbaijan and Armenia. President Trump, who facilitated the negotiations, hailed the agreement as a significant step towards resolving one of the longest-running conflicts in the region.
The signing of the peace deal at the White House marks a crucial turning point in the Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict and has raised hopes for a lasting resolution to the decades-old dispute.
Sources Analysis:
– The White House: The White House is the official residence and workplace of the President of the United States. While it plays a significant role in shaping public opinion, it may have a bias towards presenting actions of the President favorably.
– Azerbaijani Government: The Azerbaijani government may have a vested interest in portraying the peace deal positively to the public to gain domestic and international support. It’s essential to corroborate their statements with other sources for accuracy.
– Armenian Government: Similarly, the Armenian government may have a bias in how it presents the peace deal to its citizens and the international community. It’s crucial to verify their claims independently.
Fact Check:
– The signing of the peace deal at the White House – Verified facts. This information can be confirmed through official statements and news reports.
– Armenia agreeing to withdraw its forces from Nagorno-Karabakh – Verified facts. This can be corroborated through multiple sources reporting on the peace agreement.
– The presence of Russian peacekeepers in Nagorno-Karabakh – Unconfirmed claims. While this has been reported by various news outlets, further verification is needed to confirm the deployment of Russian peacekeepers in the region.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Azerbaijan and Armenia sign peace deal at White House summit with Trump”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.