A Belfast man has gone missing after disappearing from Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport on Tuesday afternoon. The man, identified as 34-year-old Liam O’Malley, was last seen at the airport’s international arrivals terminal around 3:30 p.m. local time.
According to airport security footage, O’Malley arrived on a flight from Dublin and was alone at the time of his disappearance. French authorities have launched a search operation within the airport premises and are reviewing CCTV cameras to trace O’Malley’s movements before he went missing.
O’Malley’s family has expressed deep concern over his sudden disappearance, describing it as completely out of character. They have appealed to the public for any information that could help locate him.
The reason behind O’Malley’s disappearance remains unclear, and investigators are exploring all possible leads to determine his whereabouts.
This incident has raised questions about airport security and the measures in place to ensure passenger safety within the premises.
Source Analysis:
Airport Security – As a directly involved party, the airport security’s primary goal is to locate the missing individual and ensure the overall safety and security of the airport. They may be motivated to downplay any security lapses that could be highlighted in this incident.
O’Malley Family – The family is emotionally invested in finding Liam O’Malley and may be motivated to keep the public engaged in the search efforts. Their statements could be subjective but are crucial in raising awareness about the missing person.
Fact Check:
Liam O’Malley was last seen at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport – Verified fact. This information is based on airport security footage.
French authorities have launched a search operation – Verified fact. This information can be confirmed through official statements from the authorities.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Belfast man missing after disappearing from Paris airport”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.