A bid was recently launched in Zimbabwe aiming to extend the term of President Emmerson Mnangagwa in office. The proposal was put forth by a group of lawmakers from the ruling ZANU-PF party. The bid seeks to lengthen Mnangagwa’s current term by another three years, which would postpone the upcoming 2023 elections.
Supporters of the proposal argue that President Mnangagwa needs more time to implement his vision for the country and address the various challenges facing Zimbabwe, including economic issues and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. They believe that an extension of his term would provide the stability and continuity needed for Zimbabwe’s development.
However, critics have raised concerns about the bid, questioning its constitutionality and highlighting the potential risks it poses to the country’s democratic processes. Opposition parties and civil society groups have strongly opposed the move, denouncing it as undemocratic and a way for the current administration to cling to power.
President Mnangagwa himself has not made any public statements regarding the bid to extend his term. It remains to be seen how the proposal will progress and whether it will garner enough support to be successful in Zimbabwe’s parliament.
The situation is fluid, with debates and discussions ongoing regarding the potential extension of President Mnangagwa’s term in office. The outcome of these deliberations will have significant implications for the future political landscape of Zimbabwe.
**Sources Analysis:**
The sources used for this article include statements from lawmakers supporting the bid, critics opposing it, and the absence of a public statement from President Mnangagwa. These sources have varying degrees of bias based on their affiliations and interests within the political landscape of Zimbabwe.
**Fact Check:**
– The bid to extend President Mnangagwa’s term in office by three years is a verified fact, based on statements from the group of lawmakers who proposed it.
– Supporter arguments about the need for more time for President Mnangagwa to address challenges in Zimbabwe are unconfirmed claims, as they are subjective opinions rather than concrete facts.
– Criticisms of the bid as undemocratic and a threat to democratic processes are opinions that cannot be independently verified, given the subjective nature of such assessments.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Bid launched to extend Zimbabwe president’s term in office”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.