Buy now, pay later checks will block some shoppers
Following recent updates in the buy now, pay later industry, several major players have announced that they will be implementing credit checks before allowing customers to use their services. This new development aims to prevent individuals with poor credit history from accumulating debt they may struggle to repay later on.
Klarna, one of the leading companies in this sector, stated that they will start performing soft credit checks on customers in the United States. This move comes after concerns were raised about the potential negative impact of such services on vulnerable consumers. Soft credit checks do not affect an individual’s credit score and are commonly used to verify the applicant’s identity.
On the other hand, some critics argue that implementing credit checks could exclude a significant portion of prospective users who rely on buy now, pay later services for their flexibility and convenience. They fear that this measure could disproportionately affect low-income individuals or those with limited access to traditional credit options.
Overall, the decision to introduce credit checks in the buy now, pay later industry has sparked a debate regarding the balance between consumer protection and financial inclusion. While supporters believe it will promote more responsible borrowing habits, opponents are concerned about the potential consequences for marginalized groups who may face difficulties in meeting the new requirements.
As the industry continues to evolve, it remains to be seen how these changes will impact both businesses and consumers in the long run.
Sources Analysis:
Klarna – Klarna has a vested interest in maintaining a positive reputation and complying with financial regulations to ensure the longevity of its business. As a key player in the buy now, pay later sector, their statements may be biased towards promoting their own interests.
Critics of credit checks – These individuals or groups may have concerns about financial inclusion and consumer protection. Their motives include advocating for the rights of marginalized individuals who could be adversely affected by the new credit check requirements.
Fact Check:
Klarna will start performing soft credit checks – Verified fact. This information has been officially announced by Klarna and can be independently verified through their public statements.
Critics argue that credit checks could exclude users – Unconfirmed claim. While this concern is valid, the extent to which certain groups may be excluded due to credit checks remains to be seen and can vary depending on implementation.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Buy now, pay later checks will block some shoppers”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.