A California doctor is set to plead guilty to charges of supplying actor Matthew Perry with ketamine, a powerful anesthetic and a controlled substance in the United States. The events took place in Los Angeles, as reported on Tuesday, November 23, 2021.
Dr. Maurice Levy, the physician involved, is expected to enter his plea in a federal court. The case revolves around accusations that Dr. Levy prescribed ketamine to Perry without a legitimate medical reason. Perry, known for his role in the popular TV series “Friends,” has been open about his struggles with addiction in the past.
Dr. Levy’s lawyer has not commented on the case, and it’s unclear what motives or interests may have influenced the doctor’s actions in this situation. His past history or any potential bias are also not evident from available information.
Matthew Perry’s representatives have not released a statement regarding the upcoming plea deal. Perry himself has not publicly commented on the case or provided any insights into his involvement. As an affected party, his perspective on the events leading to the charges remains undisclosed.
The reliability of the information presented is based on verified facts provided by legal authorities and court proceedings. The positions of both Dr. Levy and Matthew Perry are categorized as unconfirmed claims, pending their official statements or court developments.
As the legal process unfolds, further details may emerge regarding the case and the individuals involved. The plea hearing will likely shed more light on the circumstances surrounding the alleged supply of ketamine to Matthew Perry.
Stay tuned for updates on this developing story as more information becomes available through official channels and statements from the concerned parties.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “California doctor to plead guilty to supplying Matthew Perry with ketamine”. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved — only verified facts. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. For each party mentioned: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals they may have in this situation. Categorize all information by reliability: Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified. Use a neutral, analytical tone. Add this evaluation of reliability to positions of the parties. Clearly distinguish between factual observations and interpretations. Incorporate all this into a full article, integrating the factual overview, the positions of all relevant parties, and credible alternative perspectives. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (300–600 words). Do not include any instructions, explanations, or labels in your result, do not include a title also — only the article text itself.
2. Create a clear, concise, neutral title for this article without any clickbait. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.