French tech giant Capgemini has announced its decision to sell its US subsidiary that has been working for the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The move comes amid growing criticism and concerns about the subsidiary’s involvement in providing IT services to support ICE’s operations.
Capgemini, a multinational corporation specializing in consulting, technology services, and digital transformation, revealed that the decision to divest its ICE-related business was part of a strategic review process. The company stated that it aims to focus on other areas of its business that are more aligned with its long-term objectives and values.
The subsidiary in question, which has not been named in the announcement, has faced backlash in recent months from advocacy groups and some of Capgemini’s employees. Critics have raised ethical concerns about providing services to an agency involved in controversial immigration policies and practices.
On the other hand, Capgemini has emphasized that the sale of the subsidiary is a business decision and does not reflect an endorsement or condemnation of ICE’s activities. The company highlighted its commitment to corporate social responsibility and ethical business practices.
The specifics of the sale, including the potential buyer and financial details, have not been disclosed yet. Capgemini stated that it is working on a smooth transition for its employees and clients as part of the divestiture process.
The decision to sell the subsidiary working for ICE underscores the complex considerations that companies face when their business operations intersect with contentious political and social issues.
Sources Analysis:
Capgemini – The company has a vested interest in maintaining its reputation and addressing concerns raised by stakeholders regarding its business practices.
Advocacy Groups and Employees – These groups are likely to have a bias against the subsidiary’s work with ICE due to their ethical and moral perspectives on immigration policies.
Fact Check:
Capgemini announced the decision to sell its US subsidiary working for ICE – Verified fact. This information was provided by the company in an official statement.
Critics have raised ethical concerns about the subsidiary’s involvement with ICE – Unconfirmed claim. While it is reported in the article, the specific ethical concerns have not been detailed.
The specifics of the sale have not been disclosed yet – Verified fact. Capgemini has not provided details about the sale in its announcement.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “French tech giant Capgemini to sell US subsidiary working for ICE”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.