A string of celebrity scandals in South Korea has reignited the debate surrounding the country’s so-called ‘cancel culture’. The controversies involve several high-profile individuals in the entertainment industry.
One of the incidents, which took place last week, centered around a popular K-pop idol who was accused of making insensitive remarks during a live stream. The idol issued a public apology, expressing remorse for the hurtful comments.
Another scandal involved a well-known actor who faced backlash for alleged tax evasion. The actor denied the accusations, stating that they were based on misunderstandings and misinformation.
These incidents have sparked discussions about the role of social media in holding public figures accountable for their actions. While some argue that ‘cancel culture’ can be a tool for justice and accountability, others raise concerns about the potential for excessive punishment and lack of due process.
The public reactions to these scandals vary, with supporters calling for accountability and critics cautioning against swift judgments. The debate continues as South Korea grapples with the complexities of balancing free speech, accountability, and the power of online communities in shaping public discourse.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “String of celebrity scandals renews debate on South Korea’s ‘cancel culture'”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.