Childhood friends found a $55,000 diamond in the state of Madhya Pradesh, India. The two friends, Ravi and Karan, stumbled upon the gem while playing near a mine in the Panna district. The diamond, which weighs around 14.98 carats, is estimated to be worth approximately $55,000.
According to Ravi, they initially thought it was a marble but later realized it was a precious stone. The friends have handed over the diamond to the local authorities for evaluation and further processing.
Local officials have confirmed the discovery and are conducting assessments to determine the exact value of the diamond. They have praised the boys for their honesty in reporting the find and turning it in.
Rumors have circulated that the boys might receive a reward for their discovery, but officials have not made any official statements regarding this matter. The authorities have emphasized the importance of following the legal procedures in such cases to ensure fairness and transparency.
The news of the childhood friends finding the valuable diamond has sparked excitement in the region, with many locals lauding the boys for their rare find and integrity.
Source Analysis:
– Local Authorities: The local authorities are directly involved and have an interest in ensuring the proper evaluation and processing of the diamond. They are likely to provide a balanced perspective on the incident.
– Ravi and Karan: As the finders of the diamond, Ravi and Karan might have personal motives, such as gaining recognition or a potential reward, which could influence their statements.
Fact Check:
– The discovery of the diamond by Ravi and Karan is a verified fact as reported by local authorities and confirmed by the boys themselves.
– The estimated value of the diamond at $55,000 is an unconfirmed claim until the authorities complete their evaluation and provide an official figure.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Childhood friends find ‘$55,000 diamond’ in India”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.