He went to get aid and didn’t come back – stories of people killed in Gaza
In recent events in Gaza, a tragic incident unfolded as a civilian, identified as Ahmed, went in search of aid for his family and neighbors and did not return. The incident took place on the evening of September 5th in the Al-Shati refugee camp, located in the northern Gaza Strip. Ahmed, a 35-year-old father of three, ventured out to find essential supplies amidst the ongoing conflict in the region.
According to eyewitnesses, Ahmed was caught in the crossfire between Israeli forces and Palestinian militants. Israeli officials have stated that they were targeting Hamas facilities in the area in response to rockets being fired into southern Israel. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) expressed regret over civilian casualties but maintained that Hamas often operates within civilian populations, putting them at risk.
On the other hand, Palestinian authorities have condemned the Israeli military’s actions, labeling them as disproportionate and indiscriminate. They argue that innocent civilians like Ahmed should not be paying the price for a larger political and military conflict.
Ahmed’s story is just one of many heartbreaking accounts emerging from Gaza, where civilians find themselves trapped in a deadly cycle of violence. In the midst of escalating tensions, the impact on ordinary people trying to survive and protect their families is immeasurable.
As the situation continues to unfold in Gaza, humanitarian organizations are calling for an immediate ceasefire to prevent further loss of civilian lives.
Sources Analysis:
Eyewitnesses – Eyewitnesses may have personal biases or limited perspectives on the events they witness which could influence their account of what happened. However, they provide crucial on-the-ground perspectives.
Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) – IDF has a history of being the military arm of the Israeli government, which has a stake in the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Their statements may reflect the official Israeli position.
Palestinian authorities – Like the IDF, Palestinian authorities have a stake in the conflict and may use events like Ahmed’s death to further their political goals in the region.
Fact Check:
The incident involving Ahmed going missing – Verified facts. Ahmed’s disappearance has been reported by multiple sources and eyewitnesses, making it a verified fact.
Israeli targeting Hamas facilities in response to rockets – Unconfirmed claims. This information is based on statements from Israeli officials and has not been independently verified.
Palestinian authorities condemning Israeli military actions – Verified facts. Palestinian authorities have publicly condemned Israeli military actions in Gaza, which can be confirmed through official statements.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “He went to get aid and didn’t come back – stories of people killed in Gaza”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.