Clintons asked to testify in congressional Epstein investigation
Former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have been formally requested to testify in front of Congress regarding their connections to deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein. The request comes as part of an ongoing investigation into Epstein’s alleged sex trafficking ring and accusations of sexual abuse involving minors.
The House Judiciary Committee has written to the Clintons, among other prominent figures, to provide information and testimony about their relationship with Epstein. The committee has indicated that it aims to ensure accountability and shed light on any potential wrongdoing or negligence in allowing Epstein’s illicit activities to persist.
Both Bill and Hillary Clinton have denied any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein and have stated that they are willing to cooperate with the investigation. They have expressed their commitment to clarifying any aspects of their past interactions with Epstein and his associates.
The Clintons’ involvement with Epstein has drawn scrutiny in recent years, especially following Epstein’s arrest in 2019 on federal charges of sex trafficking minors. Epstein had connections to numerous high-profile individuals from various sectors, including politics, business, and entertainment.
The request for the Clintons to testify is seen as a significant development in the investigation, as it may provide further insight into the extent of Epstein’s network and the circumstances surrounding his alleged criminal activities.
Overall, the request for the Clintons to testify in the congressional Epstein investigation reflects the broader push for transparency and accountability regarding the late financier’s actions and those associated with him.
Sources Analysis:
House Judiciary Committee – The committee has the goal of oversight and investigation into various matters, including potential misconduct. It may have a political interest in pursuing this investigation, though its role is also to ensure accountability.
Fact Check:
The request for the Clintons to testify in front of Congress – Verified fact. The House Judiciary Committee has publicly announced this request.
Denial of wrongdoing by the Clintons – Unconfirmed claim. The Clintons’ denial has been reported by various media outlets but has not undergone formal verification processes.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Clintons asked to testify in congressional Epstein investigation”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.