In a tragic incident that has deepened the mystery surrounding the Air India crash, cockpit audio recordings have raised questions about the final moments before the disaster. The Boeing 737-800 aircraft, operating as Air India Express flight 1344, was attempting to land at Calicut International Airport in Kerala, India, on August 7, 2020, when it overshot the runway, skidded, and broke into two, resulting in the loss of 21 lives and injuring many others.
The cockpit audio recordings reveal a conversation between the pilot and the co-pilot discussing the challenges of the weather and the approach to landing. The pilot had initially decided to make a “belly landing” instead of attempting a “go-around,” a maneuver to abort the landing and circle back. However, the aircraft’s tail hit the runway first, leading to its tragic outcome.
Air India Express claims that the pilot was a seasoned veteran with thousands of hours of flying experience, while the co-pilot was also adequately qualified. The airline emphasized that the crew underwent regular training and were deemed fit for the flight. The Air India Pilots Association has called for a thorough investigation into the crash to understand the sequence of events that led to such a catastrophic result.
The cockpit audio recordings have sparked debates among aviation experts, with some questioning the decision-making process in high-stress situations and the lack of adherence to standard operating procedures. As the investigation continues, authorities are looking into various factors, including weather conditions, pilot actions, and technical malfunctions, to determine the exact cause of the crash.
The release of the cockpit audio has provided valuable insights into the last moments of Flight 1344, but it has also added complexity to unraveling the mystery surrounding the crash. As the aviation community mourns the lives lost in this tragic event, all eyes are on the investigative authorities to shed light on the underlying causes and prevent such incidents in the future.
Sources Analysis:
Cockpit audio recordings – These recordings are directly involved in the incident and provide crucial insights into the final moments of the flight. They are considered a reliable source of information for understanding the sequence of events leading to the crash.
Air India Express – As the operator of the flight, Air India Express may have a vested interest in downplaying any potential negligence on the part of the crew or airline. Their statements should be analyzed with caution to ensure transparency in the investigation process.
Fact Check:
Cockpit audio recordings – Verified facts. These recordings are considered reliable evidence of the communication between the pilot and co-pilot during the flight’s final moments.
Pilot experience – Unconfirmed claims. While Air India Express claims the pilot was experienced, this information is subject to further investigation to determine its accuracy and relevance to the crash.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Why cockpit audio deepens the mystery of Air India crash”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.