A Colombian court has overturned the conviction of former President Alvaro Uribe, a decision that has stirred controversy and divided public opinion in the country. The Supreme Court ruling on Tuesday cited procedural issues as the reason for the reversal of the 2018 verdict that found Uribe guilty of bribery and fraud.
The case against Uribe stems from allegations that he had pressured witnesses to retract statements linking him to paramilitary groups. The former president has consistently denied any wrongdoing, stating that the charges against him were politically motivated.
Supporters of Uribe have welcomed the court’s decision, viewing it as a validation of his innocence and a victory for the rule of law. On the other hand, critics and human rights organizations have expressed dismay, arguing that the ruling may set a dangerous precedent and undermine efforts to hold powerful figures accountable for their actions.
The court’s decision is not final and can still be appealed. As the legal process continues, the debate over Uribe’s innocence or guilt is likely to persist, reflecting the deep political and social divisions that exist within Colombian society.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Colombian court overturns former president’s conviction”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.