Residents of a neighborhood located next to a US data center in undisclosed location have voiced concerns about the quality of their water supply. Several residents have reported that the water coming out of their taps is discolored, emits a foul odor, and causes skin irritation when used for showering. One resident, who chose to remain anonymous, stated, “I can’t drink the water coming out of my tap. It’s concerning to see such a drastic change in water quality.”
The data center, owned by a major tech company, has denied any wrongdoing. In a brief statement to the press, a spokesperson for the data center said that they conduct regular tests of their infrastructure and processes, including water management systems, and have found no issues that could lead to the reported problems. They emphasized their commitment to environmental responsibility and the well-being of the surrounding community.
Local authorities have confirmed that they are investigating the residents’ complaints. The Department of Environmental Quality has taken water samples for testing to determine the cause of the contamination. They have assured residents that the situation is being taken seriously, and results from the analysis will be made public as soon as they are available.
The residents, data center, and local authorities all have a vested interest in resolving this issue promptly. The residents seek clean and safe water for their daily needs, the data center aims to maintain a positive relationship with the community and comply with environmental regulations, while the authorities are responsible for ensuring the well-being of all citizens in the area. As investigations continue, the community remains hopeful for a swift resolution to the water quality problem.
Source Analysis:
Residents – While residents are directly affected by the water quality issue, they may have limited technical knowledge about the potential causes, which could influence their understanding and portrayal of the situation.
Data Center – As the entity being accused of causing the water issues, the data center may have a vested interest in downplaying any potential faults in their infrastructure to protect their reputation and avoid legal repercussions.
Local Authorities – The authorities have a responsibility to investigate and address environmental concerns in their jurisdiction, aiming to maintain public trust and safety. Their actions may be influenced by the need to act promptly and decisively in response to the residents’ complaints.
Fact Check:
Residents’ reports of discolored water, odor, and skin irritation – Unconfirmed claims: While residents may genuinely be experiencing these issues, the specific cause of these problems has not been officially confirmed until the authorities complete their investigation.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘I can’t drink the water’ – life next to a US data centre”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.