Congress remains deadlocked on shutdown ahead of Monday vote
As the deadline looms for a crucial Monday vote, Congress remains deadlocked on reaching a resolution to avert a government shutdown. The impasse stems from disagreement between the two major parties on the proposed budget allocation.
Republicans are pushing for increased funding for border security, citing concerns over illegal immigration and the need to secure the nation’s borders. They argue that this funding is essential for national security and fulfilling a key campaign promise.
On the other hand, Democrats are adamant about not allocating additional funds for border security, emphasizing the humanitarian crisis and the negative impact of a border wall. They maintain that other solutions, such as technology and more personnel, would be more effective in addressing border issues.
Both parties have engaged in heated debates and blame games, with no signs of a compromise in sight. The stakes are high, with millions of federal workers facing the possibility of furloughs and government services grinding to a halt if an agreement is not reached before the deadline.
The deadlock has led to growing frustration among the public, who are concerned about the potential ramifications of a government shutdown. The upcoming Monday vote will be crucial in determining whether Congress can break the impasse and keep the government running.
Sources Analysis:
Both parties involved in the deadlock have a history of bias towards their respective stances on border security, which may influence their motivations and statements in this situation.
Fact Check:
The deadlock in Congress and the disagreement over budget allocations are verified facts. The positions and arguments presented by both Republicans and Democrats are statements that cannot be independently verified as they are based on their own perspectives and priorities.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Congress remains deadlocked on shutdown ahead of Monday vote”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.