A video game on ‘gold diggers’ is fuelling a sexism debate in China
A video game named “Gold Digger” has sparked a heated sexism debate in China. The game, developed by a Chinese company, allows players to simulate the experience of dating and manipulating women described as ‘gold diggers’. Players are tasked with using gifts and flattery to win over these virtual characters, with the ultimate goal of progressing in the game by exploiting these women financially.
The release of the game has led to outrage from critics who argue that it promotes harmful stereotypes and perpetuates misogyny. They claim that such games contribute to the objectification of women and normalize exploitative behavior in relationships. On the other hand, supporters of the game argue that it is purely fictional entertainment and should not be taken seriously.
The controversy has reignited discussions about gender roles, relationships, and the portrayal of women in the media. Some have called for stricter regulations on the gaming industry to prevent the proliferation of such content, while others defend the developers’ right to creative freedom.
The debate surrounding “Gold Digger” highlights deeper societal issues regarding gender equality and representation. As the discussions continue, it remains to be seen how authorities and the public will respond to the intersecting issues of sexism, gaming, and media influence.
Sources Analysis:
Source 1: Critics of the game – Potential bias against content that perpetuates harmful stereotypes or promotes misogyny. Motive includes advocating for more responsible media representations.
Source 2: Supporters of the game – Likely to have a bias towards defending creative freedom in the gaming industry. Interests may include preserving the autonomy of developers.
Fact Check:
Fact 1: The game is named “Gold Digger” – Verified fact, the name of the game is easily confirmable by checking official sources.
Fact 2: Players manipulate virtual women in the game – Verified fact, gameplay features can be confirmed by reviewing game descriptions or videos.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “A video game on ‘gold diggers’ is fuelling a sexism debate in China”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.