In Indonesia, a cartoon skull has emerged as a symbol of defiance, sparking controversy and debate among the public. The image, known as “The Skull Emoji,” features a skull with large, round eyes and two bones crossed beneath it.
The symbol gained prominence when a group of activists used it during protests against government policies they deemed oppressive. They argue that the cartoon skull represents their resistance to what they perceive as unjust actions by authorities.
On the other hand, government officials have condemned the use of the symbol, labeling it as a form of incitement and subversion. They claim that those displaying the cartoon skull are promoting disorder and disobedience, posing a threat to the country’s stability and unity.
The cartoon skull’s sudden rise to prominence has divided public opinion, with some supporting its use as a legitimate form of protest and expression, while others view it as a dangerous tool that could fuel unrest.
As the debate continues, the cartoon skull remains a potent symbol in Indonesia, encapsulating the growing tensions between dissenting voices and the authorities.
Sources Analysis:
– Activist Group: The activist group using the cartoon skull symbol has a clear bias towards advocating for their cause. They have a vested interest in promoting their message of resistance and defiance.
– Government Officials: The government officials denouncing the symbol are likely biased in favor of maintaining law and order. Their goal is to suppress any form of dissent that they perceive as a threat to their authority.
Fact Check:
– The use of the cartoon skull symbol by activists during protests is a verified fact, as it has been widely reported by multiple sources.
– Government officials’ condemnation of the symbol as incitement and subversion is a statement that cannot be independently verified, as it is based on their interpretation of the symbol’s meaning and intent.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “How a cartoon skull became a symbol of defiance in Indonesia”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.