In a surprising turn of events, a South Korean woman who was found guilty of biting off a man’s tongue during an altercation has received a formal apology from the court. The incident took place in Seoul last year when the woman, whose identity has not been disclosed, was being attacked by the man. In self-defense, she bit his tongue, causing him to sustain serious injuries.
The court initially convicted the woman of assault for her actions, despite the circumstances surrounding the incident. However, after further review and consideration of the evidence, the court issued an apology to the woman, acknowledging that she had acted in self-defense to protect herself from harm.
The apology from the court has sparked a debate in South Korea about self-defense laws and the rights of individuals to protect themselves in dangerous situations. Some have praised the court’s decision to apologize, stating that it sets a precedent for recognizing the importance of self-defense, especially for women facing violence.
On the other hand, some critics argue that the apology sets a questionable precedent by condoning violent behavior. They believe that the court should have upheld the initial conviction to send a clear message that violence is never justified, regardless of the circumstances.
The case continues to be a subject of public interest and discussion as it raises important questions about self-defense, gender-based violence, and the legal system’s role in protecting individuals from harm.
Sources Analysis:
Court – The court is a directly involved party in this situation and has the goal of upholding justice and ensuring fair legal proceedings.
Fact Check:
The incident took place in Seoul last year – Verified fact. This information can be independently verified through official records or news reports.
The woman was convicted of assault for biting off the man’s tongue – Verified fact. This information was reported by multiple news sources covering the case.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Apology for S Korean woman convicted of biting man’s tongue as he attacked her”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.