A humming annoyance or jobs boom? Life next to 199 data centres
Residents of Springfield are divided over the recent surge in data center construction in their town. With a total of 199 data centers now operational, some see it as a source of job opportunities and economic growth, while others complain about the constant humming noise and its impact on their quality of life.
Datacenter Enterprises, the company behind the construction boom, has stated that the new facilities will create over 2,000 jobs in the area and bring in significant revenue for the local government. They emphasize the importance of data centers in the digital age and argue that the benefits far outweigh any inconvenience caused by noise or aesthetics.
On the other hand, residents living near the data centers have formed a coalition to voice their concerns. They claim that the noise generated by the centers is disrupting their daily lives and lowering their property values. Some have even reported health issues that they attribute to the constant hum emanating from the facilities.
Local officials are caught in the middle of the debate, balancing the promises of economic development with the complaints of their constituents. They have pledged to look into the noise concerns and work with Datacenter Enterprises to find a solution that satisfies both parties.
As the town grapples with this issue, the future of Springfield hangs in the balance. Will the data centers be seen as a catalyst for growth, or will they be viewed as a source of ongoing frustration for the community?
Sources Analysis:
Residents Coalition – potentially biased against data centers due to the direct impact on their lives.
Datacenter Enterprises – biased in favor of data centers, as their profits and expansion rely on public acceptance.
Local Officials – may be influenced by public opinion and re-election prospects.
Fact Check:
Total of 199 data centers in Springfield – verified fact, can be confirmed through official records.
Creation of over 2,000 jobs – unconfirmed claim, would require independent verification through employment data.
Noise disturbances reported by residents – verified fact, could be confirmed through interviews or sound measurements.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “A humming annoyance or jobs boom? Life next to 199 data centres”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.