A deepfake website known for creating and sharing ‘nudified’ images of clothed women without their consent has been fined £55,000 for failing to implement adequate age verification measures. The UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) issued the fine to the website’s operator, which claimed to use artificial intelligence to generate the explicit content.
The incident took place online, where the deepfake site provided a platform for users to submit photos of women fully dressed, which were then digitally altered to appear nude. Despite the explicit and non-consensual nature of the content, the site did not have proper age verification processes in place, allowing minors to access and potentially distribute the material.
The ICO emphasized the importance of protecting individuals’ privacy and ensuring that explicit content is not disseminated without consent. The website operator was found in violation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for failing to safeguard the personal data of the individuals depicted in the images.
In response to the fine, the website operator expressed regret for the lack of age verification measures and stated that they have since shut down the website voluntarily. They also assured that they are cooperating fully with the ICO’s investigation and are committed to addressing the issues raised.
The case highlights the challenges posed by deepfake technology and the importance of implementing robust safeguards to prevent the misuse of individuals’ images and personal data online.
Sources Analysis:
ICO – The Information Commissioner’s Office is a reputable UK authority on data privacy issues, known for its impartial enforcement of data protection regulations. It is not directly involved in the deepfake website but has a vested interest in upholding privacy laws.
Deepfake website operator – The operator of the deepfake website has a clear vested interest in downplaying their wrongdoing. Their statements should be viewed with caution due to the potential bias in minimizing their culpability and the impact of the fine.
Fact Check:
1. The deepfake website was fined £55,000 – Verified fact, confirmed by the ICO’s official statement.
2. The website operator claimed to use artificial intelligence to generate explicit content – Unconfirmed claim, as there may not be independent verification of the AI usage.
3. The website did not have proper age verification processes – Verified fact, confirmed by the ICO’s findings.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Deepfake ‘nudify’ site fined £55,000 over lack of age checks”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.