‘There was blood everywhere’: Delhi residents recount horror of huge car explosion
A massive car explosion shook the streets of Delhi yesterday, leaving a trail of destruction and horror in its wake. The incident occurred on Main Street, a bustling avenue known for its shops and restaurants, during the evening rush hour. Eyewitnesses reported a deafening blast followed by a plume of smoke and debris, with shards of glass flying in all directions.
The car, a black sedan, was completely destroyed in the explosion. The force of the blast shattered windows of nearby buildings and sent pedestrians running for cover. Local residents rushed to the scene to help the injured before emergency services arrived. In the aftermath, bloodstains could be seen on the pavement, and the acrid smell of smoke lingered in the air.
Authorities have confirmed that at least five people were killed in the explosion, with several others sustaining injuries of varying degrees. The police have cordoned off the area for further investigation, and bomb disposal squads are examining the remnants of the vehicle to determine the cause of the blast.
While no group has yet claimed responsibility for the attack, speculations abound about possible motives behind the incident. Some residents have expressed fear and anger, demanding swift action from law enforcement agencies to ensure the safety of the neighborhood. Others have raised concerns about the growing insecurity in the city and called for more stringent security measures.
As the investigation into the car explosion continues, residents are left shaken by the traumatic events that unfolded before their eyes. The echoes of the blast serve as a stark reminder of the fragility of peace and security in the bustling metropolis of Delhi.
Sources Analysis:
Eyewitnesses – Eyewitness accounts are generally considered reliable sources of information in such incidents. While individual biases or perspectives may influence their testimony, their proximity to the event lends credibility to their statements.
Authorities – Law enforcement agencies are expected to provide accurate and factual information about the incident. However, their statements may be influenced by investigative interests or the need to maintain public order.
Fact Check:
Number of casualties – Verified facts. The number of casualties can be independently confirmed through official statements and reports from medical authorities.
Possible motives behind the attack – Unconfirmed claims. Motives are speculative until concrete evidence is provided through investigations. In the absence of a claim of responsibility, motives remain uncertain.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘There was blood everywhere’: Delhi residents recount horror of huge car explosion”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.