Toxic haze in Delhi despite ‘green’ Diwali
Toxic air pollution continues to choke the capital city of Delhi, even after a relatively ‘green’ Diwali celebration. The city woke up to thick smog on Monday, the morning after Diwali, despite efforts to curb firecracker use and promote environmentally friendly celebrations.
Authorities in Delhi had imposed a temporary ban on the sale and use of firecrackers, except for ‘green’ crackers, in an attempt to mitigate the annual spike in air pollution levels during the festival. However, the air quality index in the city still crossed the ‘severe’ mark on Monday, with PM2.5 levels reaching hazardous levels.
Environmental experts suggest that the poor air quality could be attributed to a combination of factors, including vehicular emissions, construction dust, and stubble burning in neighboring states. They argue that while the ‘green’ Diwali initiative may have had some positive impact, more comprehensive and sustained efforts are needed to address the root causes of pollution in the region.
Meanwhile, proponents of traditional Diwali celebrations have expressed disappointment over the restrictions imposed on firecrackers, arguing that it is a cultural tradition that should be preserved. They emphasize the need for a balanced approach that considers both environmental concerns and cultural sentiments.
The situation has once again raised concerns about the efficacy of short-term measures in combating air pollution in Delhi, highlighting the persistent challenges faced by authorities in tackling this ongoing environmental crisis.
Sources Analysis:
Authorities in Delhi – The government officials have a vested interest in showcasing their actions in a positive light to maintain public trust and support.
Environmental experts – Experts in the field of environmental science are likely to be driven by the objective of raising awareness about the complex causes of air pollution and advocating for long-term solutions.
Traditional Diwali proponents – Individuals advocating for traditional Diwali celebrations may have cultural and emotional ties to the festival, influencing their perspective on the restrictions.
Fact Check:
Ban on firecrackers during Diwali – Verified facts. The temporary ban on firecrackers, except for ‘green’ crackers, was imposed by authorities in Delhi and widely reported in the media.
Air quality index crossing ‘severe’ mark – Verified facts. The increase in air pollution levels post-Diwali was reported by multiple sources and can be verified through air quality monitoring data.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Toxic haze in Delhi despite ‘green’ Diwali”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.