Inside the room where the Nobel Peace Prize is decided
The Norwegian Nobel Committee recently convened in Oslo to deliberate on the recipient of the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize for the year. The committee, comprised of five members appointed by the Norwegian Parliament, met behind closed doors in the committee room at the Nobel Institute. Among the attendees were Chair Berit Reiss-Andersen, Secretary Olav Njølstad, and other committee members.
During the discussions, various nominees were considered for their contributions to peace efforts globally. The committee reviewed the nominations and engaged in thorough debates to reach a consensus on the most deserving candidate. The decision-making process involved careful consideration of each nominee’s impact and the adherence to Alfred Nobel’s will, which specified the promotion of fraternity between nations.
The process is known to be highly confidential, with committee members sworn to secrecy. The deliberations are based on the principles of impartiality and independence, focusing solely on the candidates’ merits in promoting peace. The committee aims to select individuals or groups that have made significant strides in resolving conflicts, advancing human rights, or promoting international cooperation.
The decision on the Nobel Peace Prize recipient is scheduled to be announced in October, drawing global attention to the laureate’s work and the committee’s decision-making process.
Sources Analysis:
The information in this article is based on the official procedures and guidelines set by the Norwegian Nobel Committee. The sources involved in this article have a long-standing reputation for upholding transparency and integrity in the selection of the Nobel Peace Prize recipient.
Fact Check:
The facts presented in the article are verified based on the established procedures and traditions followed by the Norwegian Nobel Committee in selecting the Nobel Peace Prize laureate. The information provided aligns with the standard practices observed during the decision-making process.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Inside the room where the Nobel Peace Prize is decided”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.