Former President Donald Trump has granted pardons to his close associate Rudy Giuliani and several others who were accused of involvement in a plot to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. The move comes as Trump continues to assert baseless claims of widespread voter fraud in the election he lost to Joe Biden.
The pardons were issued on the evening of January 19, just hours before Trump left office. Giuliani, a former New York City mayor and personal attorney to Trump, was among those pardoned. Giuliani played a prominent role in promoting Trump’s unfounded allegations of election fraud through numerous press conferences and legal efforts.
In a statement, the White House highlighted Giuliani’s role as a “prominent campaign surrogate” and praised his leadership in assisting Trump’s legal team. Giuliani himself has maintained that he was fighting for the truth and upholding the integrity of the electoral process.
Critics of the pardons argue that they are a continuation of Trump’s efforts to undermine the legitimacy of the 2020 election and shield his allies from accountability. They view the pardons as an abuse of presidential power to protect those who were willing to spread misinformation and challenge the democratic process.
The pardons have sparked further debate about the extent of presidential pardon powers and the implications for accountability in cases of attempted election interference. Some question whether the pardons signal a broader trend of pardoning individuals involved in efforts to subvert democracy.
Other individuals pardoned by Trump in relation to the election plot include a mix of political allies and supporters who faced legal scrutiny for their actions following the election.
The pardons raise concerns about the potential long-term consequences of undermining the rule of law and the peaceful transfer of power, as well as the continued polarization and mistrust in the U.S. political system.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Trump pardons Giuliani and others accused of plot to overturn 2020 election”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.