In the latest developments surrounding Israel’s war in Gaza and the principle of proportionality, the situation has escalated significantly. The conflict, which began on [date], has seen intense fighting between the Israeli military and Palestinian militant groups in the Gaza Strip. The violence has resulted in a significant number of casualties on both sides, including civilians.
Israeli officials have stated that the military operations in Gaza are in response to rockets being fired into Israeli territory by Hamas and other militant groups. They argue that their actions are necessary to protect Israeli citizens from these attacks and to degrade the capabilities of the militant organizations in the region.
On the other hand, Palestinian authorities and international organizations have raised concerns about the proportionality of Israel’s military response. They point to the high number of civilian casualties in Gaza, including women and children, and argue that the Israeli military’s actions may be disproportionate to the threat posed by the rocket attacks.
The United Nations and various human rights groups have called for an immediate ceasefire and for all parties to prioritize the protection of civilians. They have also called for an independent investigation into the conduct of all parties involved in the conflict to assess whether international humanitarian law has been violated.
As the conflict continues to unfold, the international community is closely monitoring the situation and calling for a peaceful resolution to the crisis to prevent further loss of life and escalation of hostilities.
Sources Analysis:
– Israeli officials: These sources may have a bias towards justifying Israeli military actions to protect its citizens and national security interests.
– Palestinian authorities: They may have a bias towards portraying Israel’s actions as disproportionate and harmful to Palestinian civilians.
– United Nations and human rights groups: These sources have a goal of upholding international humanitarian law and protecting civilian lives in conflict zones.
Fact Check:
– Israeli military operations in Gaza: Verified facts. These military operations have been widely reported by various sources.
– Concerns about civilian casualties: Verified facts. Multiple sources have reported on the high number of civilian casualties in Gaza.
– Calls for a ceasefire: Verified facts. The United Nations and human rights groups have publicly called for a ceasefire in the conflict.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Ros Atkins on… Israel’s war in Gaza and proportionality”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.