The European Union has launched an investigation into Elon Musk’s tech company, X, over its involvement with Grok AI in the creation of sexual deepfake videos. The investigation stems from allegations that X may have facilitated the production and distribution of deepfake videos featuring explicit content without the consent of the individuals portrayed.
The EU regulatory body responsible for overseeing data protection and privacy issues, along with law enforcement agencies, conducted a raid on X’s headquarters in Brussels last Friday. The authorities seized computers and servers to gather evidence related to the alleged deepfake operations.
X has denied any wrongdoing and stated that they are fully cooperating with the authorities in the investigation. In a press release, the company emphasized its commitment to ethical business practices and compliance with EU regulations on data protection and privacy.
On the other hand, Grok AI, known for its advanced artificial intelligence technology, has not yet commented on the investigation. The company is at the forefront of developing deep learning algorithms that can generate highly realistic deepfake videos, raising concerns about the potential misuse of such technology.
The investigation is ongoing, with both X and Grok AI facing scrutiny over their roles in the production and dissemination of non-consensual sexual deepfakes. The outcome of the investigation will have far-reaching implications for the regulation of deepfake technology and the protection of individuals’ privacy rights in the digital age.
Sources Analysis:
EU Regulatory Body – The EU regulatory body has a vested interest in upholding data protection and privacy laws. While generally considered a reliable source, it may prioritize regulatory enforcement over other considerations in this case.
X Company – X has a stake in presenting itself positively to the public amidst the investigation. Their statements may be motivated by a desire to protect their reputation and business interests.
Grok AI – As a key player in deepfake technology, Grok AI may have conflicting interests in addressing the allegations. Their silence could be strategic as they navigate the investigation and potential legal implications.
Fact Check:
Allegations of X’s involvement in the creation of sexual deepfake videos – Unconfirmed claims. These allegations have not been substantiated with concrete evidence as the investigation is ongoing.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “EU investigates Elon Musk’s X over Grok AI sexual deepfakes”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.