The European Union is set to vote on a trade deal with South American countries that includes safeguards for European farmers. The agreement, known as the Mercosur deal, is expected to be put to a vote next week in the European Parliament.
The deal, which has been in the works for over 20 years, aims to eliminate tariffs on industrial products and agricultural goods between the EU and the Mercosur bloc, which includes Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay. However, concerns have been raised about the impact on European farmers, particularly in the agricultural sector.
European farmers have expressed worry that the deal could lead to an influx of cheaper South American agricultural products, putting them at a competitive disadvantage. In response to these concerns, the EU has included safeguards in the agreement to protect sensitive sectors, such as beef, sugar, poultry, and ethanol.
Supporters of the deal argue that it will create new opportunities for European businesses and strengthen economic ties between the EU and Mercosur countries. They believe that the agreement will boost economic growth and benefit consumers on both sides.
Opponents, however, fear that the deal could harm European farmers and lead to lower food safety and environmental standards. Some environmental groups have also raised concerns about the impact of increased agricultural production in South America on deforestation and biodiversity.
The upcoming vote in the European Parliament will be crucial in determining the future of the EU-Mercosur trade deal and its implications for both European farmers and the broader economy.
Sources:
– European Commission: The European Commission is a key player in negotiating trade deals for the European Union. It has a vested interest in promoting the benefits of the EU-Mercosur agreement and expanding trade opportunities.
– European farmers’ unions: These organizations represent the interests of European farmers and are likely to be wary of the potential effects of the trade deal on their livelihoods.
– Environmental groups: Environmental organizations may raise concerns about the environmental impact of increased agricultural production in South America as a result of the trade agreement.
Fact Check:
– The vote on the Mercosur deal is scheduled to take place next week – Verified fact.
– The Mercosur deal includes safeguards for European farmers – Unconfirmed claim, as specific details of the safeguards are not provided in the article.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “EU to vote on South America trade deal with safeguards for farmers”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.