An ancient site in India has sparked a heated political debate, showcasing the contentious nature of the country’s historical narratives. The site in question, located in Ayodhya, is believed by some to be the birthplace of the Hindu deity Lord Ram.
The dispute over the site dates back several decades, with Hindu nationalists claiming that a temple dedicated to Lord Ram stood at the location before it was destroyed by Muslim rulers in the 16th century to build a mosque, known as the Babri Masjid. In 1992, a violent mob of Hindu extremists demolished the mosque, leading to widespread riots that resulted in the loss of thousands of lives.
Since then, the land has been a focal point of legal and political wrangling. In 2019, the Indian Supreme Court ruled that the land should be handed over to Hindus to build a temple, while also ordering the government to provide an alternative site for a mosque.
The recent excavation at the site, conducted by the Archaeological Survey of India, has reignited the debate. The findings suggest the presence of a “massive structure” beneath the mosque ruins, hinting at the possibility of a temple predating the mosque.
Hindu groups have welcomed the excavation results, hailing it as evidence of their long-standing claims. On the other hand, Muslim organizations have dismissed the findings as politically motivated and an attempt to rewrite history to suit a particular narrative.
The dispute over the Ayodhya site reflects larger tensions surrounding India’s diverse cultural and religious history. As politicians and interest groups continue to weigh in on the issue, the quest for historical truth remains mired in political agendas and societal divisions.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Ancient site stirs heated political debate on India’s past”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.