‘I didn’t hear from my son for seven months’: Inside Yemen’s UAE-run secret prisons
Dozens of families in Yemen are reporting that their loved ones have disappeared in a network of secret prisons controlled by the United Arab Emirates (UAE), according to a recent investigation by the Associated Press. The report reveals that hundreds of men have been detained, tortured, and even killed in these clandestine facilities located in the south of Yemen.
One mother, Aisha Ali, shared the story of her son, who was taken by UAE-backed security forces and held in a secret prison for seven months. She described her anguish and fear, not knowing whether her son was alive or dead during the time of his disappearance.
The UAE, a key member of the Saudi-led coalition fighting Houthi rebels in Yemen since 2015, has denied the allegations. They claim that they are committed to upholding human rights standards and have called the accusations of abuse in the prisons as baseless.
Human rights organizations, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have long criticized the UAE’s involvement in Yemen and have raised concerns about the lack of accountability for alleged abuses. They have called for independent investigations into the reported disappearances and mistreatment in the secret prisons.
The Yemeni government, backed by Saudi Arabia, has not commented on the specific allegations but has stated that they are working towards peace and stability in the war-torn country.
The situation in Yemen’s UAE-run secret prisons highlights the ongoing human rights abuses and lack of oversight in the conflict. As more families come forward with similar testimonies, pressure is mounting on the international community to address these violations and hold the responsible parties accountable.
Sources Analysis:
Associated Press – The AP is a reputable news agency known for its factual reporting and global coverage of events. It is a reliable source for news.
Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch – Both organizations have a history of advocating for human rights and are known for their impartial and thorough investigations into human rights abuses. They are credible sources for information regarding such violations.
Fact Check:
The disappearances of individuals in Yemen’s secret prisons – Verified facts. The AP investigation and testimonies from families provide evidence to support these claims.
The denial of allegations by the UAE – Unconfirmed claims. The UAE’s denial is a claim that cannot be independently verified.
Criticism from human rights organizations about the lack of accountability – Verified facts. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have publicly criticized the UAE’s involvement in Yemen and raised concerns about human rights abuses.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “‘I didn’t hear from my son for seven months’: Inside Yemen’s UAE-run secret prisons”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.