Harshita was murdered a year ago – so why has her killer not been caught, family ask
Harshita’s family is still seeking justice a year after her tragic murder. The incident took place in her apartment in the city on the night of August 15th, 2020. Harshita, a 28-year-old marketing executive, was found dead in her home by a neighbor who had heard screams coming from the apartment. The initial investigation revealed that she had been stabbed multiple times.
Despite an ongoing police investigation and public appeals for information, no arrests have been made in connection with the case. Harshita’s family is growing increasingly frustrated with the lack of progress in the investigation. They believe that someone in the neighborhood must have seen or heard something that could help solve the case.
The police, on the other hand, have stated that they are following all leads and conducting a thorough investigation. They urge anyone with information to come forward and assist in bringing the perpetrator to justice.
The family and friends of Harshita are determined to keep her memory alive and continue to seek answers as to why her killer has not been caught. They have organized awareness campaigns and vigils to keep the case in the public eye, hoping that this will lead to a breakthrough in the investigation.
The lack of closure in Harshita’s case highlights the challenges that law enforcement agencies face in solving complex murder cases. As the one-year anniversary of her death approaches, her family remains hopeful that the killer will be brought to justice soon.
Sources Analysis:
Neighbor – The neighbor who found Harshita’s body may have a bias to portray themselves in a favorable light or may have specific interests in the case.
Police – The police are a directly involved party in the investigation and their goal is to solve the case and bring the perpetrator to justice.
Family and friends – Harshita’s family and friends are emotionally involved and seeking justice for their loved one, which may impact their perspective on the case.
Fact Check:
Harshita was found dead in her apartment on August 15th, 2020 – Verified fact. This information can be verified through official police reports or news articles reporting on the incident.
The police are following all leads in the investigation – Unconfirmed claim. This statement is based on the police’s own assertions, which cannot be independently verified without access to confidential police information.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Harshita was murdered a year ago – so why has her killer not been caught, family ask”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.