I paid £15,000 for arranging IVF – then the service went bust
A fertility clinic in London has come under scrutiny after abruptly shutting down, leaving several clients in the lurch after paying significant sums for IVF treatments. One such affected individual, who preferred to remain anonymous, revealed that they had paid £15,000 to the clinic for arranging in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures. However, to their dismay, the clinic closed its doors without any warning, resulting in a loss of both money and hope for the prospective parents.
The clinic, which has not been named publicly, has yet to provide a statement regarding the sudden closure and its impact on clients. The individuals who have been affected by this turn of events are now left to navigate the complex and emotionally taxing process of seeking refunds and alternative options for their fertility treatments.
Fertility treatments are known to be a sensitive and costly endeavor, often involving significant financial and emotional investments from those seeking to start a family. The closure of fertility clinics can have devastating effects on individuals who have pinned their hopes on such services to fulfill their dreams of parenthood.
As the impacted clients grapple with the aftermath of this unexpected closure, questions arise regarding the regulations and oversight of fertility clinics to prevent such situations from occurring in the future. The case serves as a reminder of the vulnerabilities that individuals face when engaging in assisted reproductive services and the need for transparency and accountability within the fertility industry.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “I paid £15,000 for arranging IVF – then the service went bust”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Create a clear, concise, neutral title for this article without any clickbait. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.