A five-year-old boy tragically passed away after getting caught in a ski travelator at a resort in Japan. The incident occurred on Saturday afternoon at the popular ski resort located in Nagano prefecture. The young boy, whose name has not been disclosed, was on the travelator with his family when the unfortunate accident happened.
According to witness accounts, the boy fell and became entangled in the moving walkway, resulting in severe injuries. Despite immediate efforts to rescue him, including the intervention of resort staff and medical personnel, the child succumbed to his injuries shortly after being freed from the machinery.
The ski resort management expressed deep sorrow over the incident, offering their condolences to the family of the deceased child. They highlighted that safety protocols are in place at the resort, and an investigation into the specifics of the accident is underway to prevent similar incidents in the future.
Local authorities have launched a formal investigation into the circumstances surrounding the boy’s death. They have assured the public that all necessary steps will be taken to determine the cause of the accident and whether any negligence was involved.
The family of the boy is understandably devastated by the tragic event and has requested privacy during this difficult time.
This incident serves as a somber reminder of the importance of adhering to safety measures, especially in recreational settings to prevent unforeseen accidents.
Sources Analysis:
Witness Accounts – Witness statements are generally reliable in providing first-hand information about an incident. However, individual perspectives and potential biases should be taken into account.
Resort Management – The resort has an interest in maintaining its reputation and ensuring its visitors’ safety, potentially influencing their statements regarding the incident.
Local Authorities – Authorities aim to conduct a thorough investigation to determine the cause of the accident and uphold legal standards. However, their statements may be influenced by official protocols and regulations.
Fact Check:
The incident occurred at a ski resort in Nagano prefecture – Verified fact. This information can be confirmed through official reports or statements from authorities.
The boy was with his family at the time of the accident – Verified fact. This detail may come from witness testimonies or the family themselves, making it a reliable piece of information.
The boy’s name has not been disclosed – Verified fact. Privacy concerns may lead to the non-disclosure of the child’s identity.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Five-year-old boy dies after getting caught in Japan ski travelator”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.