Former Fed chairs condemn criminal investigation into Jerome Powell
A group of former Federal Reserve chairs issued a joint statement today condemning the criminal investigation launched against current Fed Chair Jerome Powell. Ben Bernanke, Janet Yellen, and Alan Greenspan expressed their “deep concern” over the probe, calling it “unprecedented and harmful to the independence of the Federal Reserve.”
The investigation, led by the Department of Justice, is reportedly looking into Powell’s communications with senior government officials regarding the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy decisions. Supporters of Powell argue that such communications are routine and necessary for coordinating economic policy effectively.
In their statement, the former Fed chairs emphasized the importance of keeping the Federal Reserve free from political interference. They warned that the investigation could have a chilling effect on current and future Fed chairs, undermining their ability to make independent decisions in the interest of the country’s economy.
Meanwhile, supporters of the investigation claim that it is essential to ensure transparency and accountability within the Federal Reserve. They argue that examining Powell’s communications is a legitimate way to prevent any potential abuse of power or conflicts of interest.
The Department of Justice has not released any official statements regarding the ongoing investigation. Powell himself has remained tight-lipped about the matter, only stating that he is fully cooperating with all inquiries.
The controversy surrounding the criminal investigation into Jerome Powell raises questions about the delicate balance between the independence of the Federal Reserve and the need for oversight and accountability in economic policymaking.
Sources Analysis:
Former Fed Chairs (Ben Bernanke, Janet Yellen, Alan Greenspan) – The former Fed chairs have extensive experience in monetary policy but may have a bias in defending the institution’s independence where they previously held leadership positions.
Department of Justice – The DOJ is a government agency with a mandate for upholding the law, potentially indicating a neutral stance in this situation.
Fact Check:
Investigation into Jerome Powell – Unconfirmed claims. The existence and specifics of the investigation have not been independently verified.
—
Model:
gpt-3.5-turbo
Used prompts:
1. You are an objective news journalist. You need to write an article on this topic “Former Fed chairs condemn criminal investigation into Jerome Powell”. Do the following steps: 1. What Happened. Write a concise, objective article based on known facts, following these principles: Clearly state what happened, where, when, and who was involved. Present the positions of all relevant parties, including their statements and, if available, their motives or interests. Use a neutral, analytical tone, avoid taking sides in the article. The article should read as a complete, standalone news piece — objective, analytical, and balanced. Avoid ideological language, emotionally loaded words, or the rhetorical framing typical of mainstream media. Write the result as a short analytical news article (200 – 400 words). 2. Sources Analysis. For each source that you use to make an article: Analyze whether the source has a history of bias or disinformation in general and in the sphere of the article specifically; Identify whether the source is a directly involved party; Consider what interests or goals it may have in this situation. Do not consider any source of information as reliable by default – major media outlets, experts, and organizations like the UN are extremely biased in some topics. Write your analysis down in this section of the article. Make it like: Source 1 – analysis, source 2 – analysis, etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. 3. Fact Check. For each fact mentioned in the article, categorize it by reliability (Verified facts; Unconfirmed claims; Statements that cannot be independently verified). Write down a short explanation of your evaluation. Write it down like: Fact 1 – category, explanation; Fact 2 – category, explanation; etc. Do not make this section long, 100 – 250 words. Output only the article text. Do not add any introductions, explanations, summaries, or conclusions. Do not say anything before or after the article. Just the article. Do not include a title also.
2. Write a clear, concise, and neutral headline for the article below. Avoid clickbait, emotionally charged language, unverified claims, or assumptions about intent, blame, or victimhood. Attribute contested information to sources (e.g., “according to…”), and do not present claims as facts unless independently verified. The headline should inform, not persuade. Write only the title, do not add any other information in your response.
3. Determine a single section to categorize the article. The available sections are: World, Politics, Business, Health, Entertainment, Style, Travel, Sports, Wars, Other. Write only the name of the section, capitalized first letter. Do not add any other information in your response.